Lab meat fights back

A version of this article originally appeared in Quartz’s members-only Weekend Brief newsletter. Quartz members get access to exclusive newsletters and more. Sign up here.

Seven states have banned a product most people couldn't buy if they tried.

Cultivated meat exists, technically. A handful of companies have federal approval to sell lab-grown chicken, salmon, or pork fat, but their offerings have appeared only at high-end restaurants and invite-only tastings. That hasn't stopped state legislatures from outlawing it as though it were about to replace every ribeye in the country.

Now the industry is fighting back. The question isn't whether Americans will ever eat meat grown from animal cells. It's whether they'll be allowed to choose.

The bans are outpacing the product itself

Florida kicked things off in May 2024, with Governor Ron DeSantis declaring that he was protecting consumers from "the global elite's plan to force the world to eat meat grown in a petri dish or bugs." Alabama followed. 

Then Mississippi, where lawmakers unanimously passed a bill carrying penalties of up to $500 and three months in jail for anyone growing or selling cultivated meat within state lines. Texas enacted a two-year moratorium in September 2025. Indiana, Montana, and Nebraska have joined the list.

Cultivated meat starts with cells taken from an animal, then grown in bioreactors with nutrients until they become muscle and fat. No slaughter required. Supporters say it could reduce the environmental footprint of livestock production, though the science on that is still evolving.

The rhetoric has been consistent for the people against it. They invoke food security, traditional ranching, and vague anxieties about what it means to eat something grown in a lab instead of on a farm.

Some of this language has drifted into conspiracy territory, with figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. calling cultivated meat a "catastrophe-in-the-making" and Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene suggesting the government might use it to surveil citizens.

The actual threat to conventional beef producers is essentially theoretical at this point. Production costs remain high, scaling remains difficult, and industry experts estimate it could take 10 to 15 years before lab-grown meat shows up widely in grocery stores. The National Cattlemen's Beef Association has publicly stated it isn't worried about marketplace competition. Some of the organization's representatives have even opposed the bans.

The industry is looking for a way forward

Rather than quietly accepting regulatory exile, cultivated meat companies are pushing back.

In Texas, two producers, Wildtype Foods and Upside Foods, filed a federal lawsuit the day after the state's ban took effect. Their argument centers on constitutional grounds, claiming the restrictions violate interstate commerce protections and amount to economic protectionism rather than legitimate safety regulation. A similar suit is underway in Florida. 

Legal observers say the bans may not survive court challenges, particularly since the Food and Drug Administration has already cleared several cultivated meat products for sale.

Meanwhile, investment in research continues. Tufts University announced this month that it would use a state grant to create an innovation hub for lab-grown foods. The facility will include lab equipment, a test kitchen, and a cell bank providing open access to cultured cells. Massachusetts officials have signaled their intent to make the state a leader in alternative proteins, even as neighboring regions remain skeptical.

Consumer interest, at least according to surveys, suggests an appetite for trying these products. A 2024 Purdue University study found that roughly 60% of respondents were willing to sample cultivated beef, chicken, or pork, with taste and price being the primary factors influencing their decisions. 

If companies can clear those two bars, consumers will likely eat it, researchers say. The market exists, even if access to it doesn't.

Not every state has embraced the prohibition trend. Republican lawmakers in Wyoming and South Dakota have killed similar bills, with some legislators arguing that government shouldn't dictate what food people can eat. One Wyoming senator quoted Thomas Jefferson while voting against the measure in his state.

The cultivated meat industry remains small, expensive, and far from mainstream viability. But the legal and political battles unfolding now will shape whether it ever gets the chance to compete. 

For an industry that barely has a product to sell, it's already learned it has plenty to fight for.