Editor's Note — Oct. 23, 2025:

The original article on this topic was published on June 5, 2025, during a major Tesla sell-off. At the time, data suggested institutional investors were joining a retail-driven panic, raising the question of whether "big money" was finally abandoning the stock.

In the months since, the opposite has occurred. Despite continued controversy and a new strategic focus on robotics, institutional ownership has reportedly increased from just under 49% to nearly 55%. This suggests the June event was less of an exodus and more of a "changing of the guard," with traditional auto-focused investors being replaced by new institutions betting on Tesla's AI and robotics ambitions. We have preserved the original report at the end of this article for context.

For Tesla investors, the first week of June 2025 was a brutal test. Following a public feud between Elon Musk and the Trump administration over a new tax bill, shares plummeted over 20%, culminating in a 14% single-day drop on June 5.

That event, which wiped out over $150 billion in market cap, raised a critical question: was this the moment institutional “big money” would finally abandon Musk?

Retail panic or institutional exit?

At the time, trading data told a story of two minds. An initial volume spike after a New York Times (NYT) report on Musk's behavior looked like a retail-driven panic. But the main event, the June 5 plunge, was different. Volume exploded to a stunning 275 million shares as the stock sank to $284. This was a clear signal that large-scale institutional investors, not just “mom and pop” sellers, were stampeding for the exit.

This institutional exit was the scenario skeptics had long predicted. For years, Tesla's stock has been a battleground. On one side, a massive, loyal base of retail investors who treat the company like a movement. On the other, a wary class of institutional managers who, while forced to own some (especially after its 2020 S&P 500 inclusion), remained put off by Musk's volatility and the stock's meme-driven nature.

In early 2025, institutional ownership hovered just under 49% — far below the 60-70% levels of peers like Apple (AAPL) or Microsoft (MSFT). The June 5 sell-off looked like the beginning of the great institutional exit.

The narrative flips

But a funny thing happened on the way to the “big-money” exodus. It stopped.

As of October 2025, the narrative has flipped. Despite a summer of continued headlines — from Musk actively lobbying against EV credits (costing Tesla a reported $1.4B in revenue) to pivoting the company's focus almost entirely to humanoid robots and the “Cybercab” — institutions didn't just stop selling. They started buying. Current filings show institutional ownership has climbed to nearly 55%.

A new thesis: AI vs. Autos

This reveals a profound shift in the investment thesis. The institutions that fled in June may have been traditional asset managers, unnerved by political risk and a CEO harming his own car sales. But they are being replaced by a new class of institutional buyer: those who believe the analyst calls raising price targets based on Full Self-Driving, Optimus, and AI. They are no longer buying Tesla, the car company; they are buying Musk's vision of Tesla, the AI and robotics company.

The result is a stock that remains as volatile as ever, but for a new reason. The core tension is no longer just “retail vs. wary institutions.” It's now a battle between two different institutional theses: one that sees an overvalued, chaotic car company with a hostile CEO, and one that sees a pre-revenue AI juggernaut. As Tesla's Q3 earnings call focused almost exclusively on robots, not cars, it's clear which narrative is winning the “big money” fight... for now.

Tesla stock plunges 14% as Trump and Elon Musk break up. Here’s what the numbers show

Published: June 5, 2025

Tesla stock had a rough week. Shares fell more than 20% and were down 14% on Thursday, June 5, alone.

Meanwhile, trading volumes — the number of shares trading hands — paint a distinct picture. Look beyond the headline stock moves, and the type of selling starts to come into focus.

On days when Wall Street panics, trading volume typically surges. On Thursday, May 30, when The New York Times (NYT) published a bombshell story about Elon Musk’s drug use, erratic behavior, and political entanglements, Tesla’s volume spiked to more than 123 million shares. In the days following, as Musk broke rank to come out against the new tax bill, the stock kept on falling, but volume largely declined — to about 81 million shares on Monday, June 2, under 100 million on Tuesday and Wednesday, and about 80 million as of midday Thursday.

That pattern suggested the later move down may have been driven more by retail investors, with smaller players getting spooked or perhaps disliking Musk’s political shift, rather than big institutions rushing to exit. When both volumes and prices see declines, it’s often a sign of “mom and pop” selling.

But by the close of market on Thursday, June 5? The picture changed again, dramatically. Volume spiked, zooming past the post-NYT surge to a stunning 275 million shares, as Tesla stock sank to $284. And that kind of move, with price falling sharply and volume rising tremendously — to levels not seen for months, if not years — starts to look a lot like big-money participation. If institutional investors were on the sidelines earlier this week, they may not be anymore.

The longer history of retail love and institutional wariness

Tesla has long been a favorite among retail investors, a dynamic that gained momentum in 2020, when pandemic-era trading booms and Elon Musk’s cult-like appeal helped make it one of the most widely held and discussed stocks on the internet. Platforms like Robinhood (HOOD) and Reddit’s WallStreetBets treated Tesla less like a company and more like a movement.

At the same time, Tesla’s addition to the S&P 500 in December 2020 forced a wave of institutional buying, including large buys from passive index funds. Later, even as Tesla’s valuation soared, traditional asset managers remained somewhat skeptical, seemingly turned off by Musk’s volatility, the stock’s eye-watering multiples, governance concerns, and its meme-driven nature.

By early 2021, institutional ownership hovered around 40% to 45%, considered somewhat below the norm for a company of Tesla’s size. Other “Magnificent 7" stocks, namely Microsoft, Nvidia, Apple, and Google parent company Alphabet, have institutional ownership as high as 60% to 70%+.

And that pattern has largely held in the years since. While institutional holdings have ticked up, and now sit just under 49%, Tesla remains somewhat under-owned by the biggest money managers compared to more staid tech names. The stock also continues to attract tremendous interest and attention from individual investors, dominating coverage across YouTube (GOOGL) finance channels, Reddit threads, and TikTok explainers.

The result is a stock that can be unusually sentiment-driven for a company of its size. It comes down to Tesla’s liquidity and prominence (some might say notoriety). Structurally speaking, it’s just a little more vulnerable to headlines than some of its big-tech peers.

Now there’s reason to think the big players are growing wary all over again

According to the most recent 13F filings, some larger firms have trimmed their Tesla stakes, while others have added. They’re months out of date, however. The danger now? If Musk’s erratic behavior keeps making headlines, big firms may decide Tesla stock is not worth what looks to be the current level of risk. And if they leave in force, this week’s drop could be only the beginning.